# OCaml

## Small tutorials

#### Continuation Passing Style

In the discuss post What is the use of Continuation Passing Style (CPS)? I wrote a small explanation that I often link to people when they want to learn about CPS. I believe Jean-Christophe FilliΓ’tre was the first one who told me about CPS and used this example to explain it to me. Here's a copy of my post.

I wrote a small (classical) example:

```
(* computing the length of a list, not tail-recursive *)
let rec list_length = function
| [] -> 0
| _::s -> 1 + list_length s (* not a tail call *)
(* tail-recursive version adding an accumulator *)
let list_length_tail l =
let rec aux acc = function
| [] -> acc
| _::s -> aux (acc + 1) s
in
aux 0 l
type 'a binary_tree =
| Empty
| Node of 'a * ('a binary_tree) * ('a binary_tree)
(* computing the height of a tree, not tail-recursive *)
let rec tree_height = function
| Empty -> 0
| Node (_, l, r) -> 1 + max (tree_height l) (tree_height r)
(* really hard to make it tail-recursive by adding an accumulator, try it... *)
(* tail-recursive version using CPS *)
let tree_height_tail t =
let rec aux t k = match t with
| Empty -> k 0
| Node (_, l, r) ->
aux l (fun lh ->
aux r (fun rh ->
k (1 + max lh rh)))
in
aux t (fun x -> x)
let () =
let l = [1; 2; 3; 4] in
Format.printf "size of the list is: %d@." (list_length l);
Format.printf "size of the list is: %d@." (list_length_tail l);
let t = Node (1, Empty, Node(2, Node (3, Empty, Empty), Empty)) in
Format.printf "height of the tree is: %d@." (tree_height t);
Format.printf "height of the tree is: %d@." (tree_height_tail t)
```

Also note that getting from the non-CPS version to the CPS one is only a syntactic transformation:

```
let rec tree_height t = match t with
| Empty -> 0
| Node (_, l, r) -> 1 + max (tree_height l) (tree_height r)
(* add intermediate values: *)
let rec tree_height t = match t with
| Empty -> 0
| Node (_, l, r) ->
let lh = tree_height l in
let rh = tree_height r in
1 + max lh rh
(* add a continuation to the args and before returning any value: *)
(* this is not valid OCaml *)
let rec tree_height t k = match t with
| Empty -> k 0
| Node (_, l, r) ->
let lh = tree_height l in
let rh = tree_height r in
k (1 + max lh rh)
(* replace all intermediate `let x = f y` by `tree_height y (fun x ->` : *)
let rec tree_height t k = match t with
| Empty -> k 0
| Node (_, l, r) ->
tree_height l (fun lh ->
tree_height r (fun rh ->
k (1 + max lh rh)))
```

#### GADT

In the discuss post Representing data more compactly but unsafely, Emile Trotignon gave the following example which I really like:

```
type a =
| Int of int
| Float of float
(* Safe but uses unnecessary boxing *)
let f_safe = function
| Int i -> i
| Float f -> int_of_float f
type b =
| Int
| Float
(* Very unsafe but no useless boxing *)
let f_unsafe tag n =
match tag with
| Int -> (Obj.magic n : int)
| Float -> int_of_float (Obj.magic n : float)
type _ c =
| Int : int c
| Float : float c
(* Same runtime behaviour as f_unsafe but safe *)
let f_gadt : type t. t c -> t -> int =
fun tag n ->
match tag with
| Int -> n
| Float -> int_of_float n
```

## Small riddles

#### How to write the `val equal : unit -> unit -> bool`

function ?

When I teach OCaml to some people, after some time, I like to ask them this question. Here are the answer I usually get.

## First answer:

`let equal x y = if x = y then true else false`

Come on ! First you should write it `let equal x y = x = y`

. But more importantly, there's no need to test for equality, there's only one inhabitant for the `unit`

type, so it's always `true`

. Try again !

## Second answer:

`let equal x y = true`

Well, `dune`

will make the compiler shrill because of unused variables. Let's try again.

## Third answer:

`let equal _ _ = true`

Better, but this has the signature `val equal : 'a -> 'b -> bool`

(and the previous answer too). How can we fix this ?

## Fourth answer:

`let equal (_ : unit) (_ : unit) = true`

OK. Now this is correct, but it's annoying we have to write the types. Unless...

## Fifth answer:

`let equal () () = true`

Yippee ! Usually the beginner is a little dumbfounded by this, as I was the first time I found this code in the stdlib. By the way, if you know a shortest way to write these (modulo whitespace changes), please tell me.

Then, what if you want to confuse the beginner completly ?

## Sixth answer:

`let equal () = (=) ()`

#### What's the shortest code producing the signature `val f : 'a -> 'b`

?

This question has been asked to me by Jean-Christophe FilliΓ’tre while we were working on WebAssembly - don't ask me how we ended up talking about this. I quickly found a solution in 15 characters, but couldn't do better. He had one with 14 characters.

## First solution in 20 characters:

`let f _=assert false`

## Second solution in 15 characters:

`let rec f x=f x`

## Third solution in 15 characters:

`let f=Obj.magic`

## Fourth solution in 14 characters:

`let f _=exit 1`

I don't know any better solution, if you do please tell me !